Senior Art Exhibit: Sarah Henson
by Brittany Szczepanik, Co-Editor-in-Chief
Cornell College often prides itself in offering an interdisciplinary education. The artwork of Sarah Henson certainly displays this, and in a very unique way. Henson combines the crucial use of language with an unflinching appreciation of the outdoors. All of her artwork is displayed on dyed paper. She uses varying shades from the warmer colors on the wheel, including brown for the base, which is similar to the hue of red clay. What is most interesting about Henson’s work, though, are the green blades of grass that are naturally grown on her work. To the viewer, it appears as though Henson is trying to prove that nature and civilization can and should coexist.
On this paper, it appears as though a smattering of letters are displaced with no certain order in mind. However, upon closer inspection, the viewer can identify and connect with Henson’s outdoor memories through her carefully chosen words and ideas. Given the placement of these letters, Henson’s work is truly unique in that each viewer may find or read different words, many of which may be unique to the observer. Each viewer may have a different experience with her artwork, but is still able to connect to the piece, as well as the artist, because of the aforementioned symbols that are the basis of our communication.
To further emphasize the connection between nature and language, Henson physically intertwines paper by creating a grass binding, where the roots of the grass physically connect the paper to the soil, ironically attempting to return the paper back to its most natural state, only altered with dye and symbols. In addition, it is important to note that the prairie grass appears on a lot of her work, but is at different stages in development. Some of the grass is thriving, others dying, but the paper and language remain constant and unchanging. Words and symbols last forever, but nature has become dependent on us and on our communication. In order to survive on the artwork, the grass must be renewed. We just have to let it.
Artist Statement
My process began with reading. My readings ranged from data on prairie ecosystems to the literary criticism of Robert Pogue Harrison and the poetry of Robert Dana. From my research on the prairie, I chose to use Andropogon Gerardii, one of the major grasses of the Midwestern prairie, in my paper. Harrison’s discussions of the cohabitation of the living with the dead and their inscribed humic histories, as well as his examinations of the place of gardens and forests in the cultural imagination of Western civilization are especially relevant. Robert Dana’s poetry has assured me throughout my studies of the deep interrelation between language and landscape.
The two visual artists to whom I feel most conceptually indebted are Ann Hamilton and John Cage. By showing the dignity of manual labor from an artistic standpoint, Ann Hamilton’s work helped me see how I could draw from my own appreciation of manual labor that I gained from working as a hired hand on various farms in the mountains of North Carolina. The labor of art-making has fulfilled a similar role in my life as farming and living in-stride with natural rhythms has in the past. John Cage, who along with his more famous performance pieces and compositions made uniquely inspired paper, was perhaps the first artist I learned about who used chance as an artistic device. All of my work embraces chance, from the placement of the letters in “Scroll,” to the natural folds and wrinkles in all of my paper that preserve the memory of their making.
As a result of this chance placement, much of the language in my work functions as both image and text, flitting from one to the other as a viewer’s perception changes, and a relationship between the text and the growth of the grass becomes apparent. I think of some of my pieces as the residue of private meditations on language and my development as someone who feels kindred to the natural world. Paper and the earth are substrates for history — preservers of our collective inheritance. As we become more detached from the natural world, our grip on the very source of our language grows more tenuous.
Learning to trust my process and seeing the physical unfolding of the art has allowed me to cling less fervently my research which before seemed essential to my work. That cycle of immaterial research and physical labor will always be a welcome part of my artistic process. |
|